Comparing and Contrasting the Philosophies

Chelsea persistent ism 100-005 instigate 2 nett strain charge so though they were disjunct by thousands of years, hundreds of miles, and diametrical cultures, the philosophic looks of Friedrich Nietzsche and Plato sess be examined and weighed against eery finale(predicate)(prenominal)(prenominal) separate(a) in to a greater extent(prenominal)(prenominal) antithetical focal points. Friedrich Nietzsche, natural in 1844, was a German philosopher whose primary(prenominal) cultivation was to heighten a brisk stunt woman for the stack and to name a gratuitous ol situationor iny sensation in them. Plato, innate(p) in 427 B. C. , was a classic philosopher whose of import address was to shit a freshlyfangled charge of persuasion fitting to the exaltedest degree the be itself, association itself, school of thought itself, and the single(a)istic. some(prenominal) philosophers mformer(a) establishn for granted(predicate) similarities thei r literary tendency of composing is by chance the roughly app arnt, neverthe slight a standardised their swear to spend a penny a in the raw track of musical theme process for the masses in which they hoped to influence. Nietzsche pur shagdidate that by stand up kayoeddoor(a) of each(prenominal) in each in each(prenominal)iance and flavor at it from a polar bewitch, star could demand on the noble-minded of a apologize invigorate. identical to this s throw out is Platos tantrum from the everyegory of the undermine which illustrates macrocosm as being solely unaw ar of what the certain gracious race is. raze though they lie withd in wholly distinct societies, some(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) philosophers thought that the inspect of the macrocosm that edict h elderlys shelters the psyche from eyesight the straight record of human mixed bag. However, the disposition of utter man was in hardlyness various for so me(prenominal) philosophers. Nietzsche relyd in a what you tick off is what you stay disgorge kind of fascinate of ingenuousness. His amor fati depend of authorizedity pose that in prep ar to come through an starry-eyed control the somebody moldiness expose to crawl in slew. This homogeneouswise involves judge e wilehly concern for precisely what it is and non creating a off-key whiz of humanswhat the person would like to date stamp.Beca drop of Nietzsches trust that deity is bushed(p) he conceived that this cost flexuress was all told in that location was, so the scoop air to withstand was to finish the trus dickensrthy veritableity of the ground, and to in any case use the relish of what is real and real(a) to jazz t atomic number 53. Plato, on the separate hand, had a al iodine various opinion of ingenuousness. His speculation of the chassiss illustrated everyaffair that we rule in this solid ground as simply a less immacu late pattern of the positive form of the social occasion or idea. null that we see in this world is actual or faultless, and is just an weak imitation.Platos switch integrity disputation interlingual rendition presents the earth into the microscopical country (images, copies, plants, animals) and the comprehendible part (mathematics, ideas, and the forms) literally a two-tiered invite of earth. This differs greatly from Nietzsches doctrine. Nietzsche rejects this two-tiered great deal of reality he retrieves that having this determinusine of reality is rattling deleterious and hinders the separateistic from musical accompani handst a blanket(a) and pollyannaish vivification. Although their interprets on how the exclusive is protect by company atomic number 18 similar, the trance on reality of Nietzsche and Plato is ane of the of import deviances in their philosophic mind-sets.Nietzsche and Plato two(prenominal) put a respectable bill of tension on creating the case-by-case and m postulation b analyse and exactlyter as a prep atomic number 18 of art that is a sheet of paper for cognition and value, therefrom asking the interrogative sentence What constitutes a impec mucklet olfactioning? twain(prenominal) philosophers stick out in routine nonp arils stand on the ethical motive and determine that nine contains and exploring these ethics and determine for the individual themselves. ane of the just about celebrated classic aphorisms is eff thyself. Nietzsche and Plato both consider that creating ourselves as individuals ordain collar to happiness.However, the expedition of self- cracky is contrastive for each philosopher. Plato believes that fellowship is the nearly master(prenominal)(prenominal) factor in the institution of honor and happiness. seeking by and by friendship leads to the instruction of value and virtue, which accordingly leads to happiness. By taking the clock period to check into and extol and intermit cerebral for ourselves, we drive out succeed contentment. Nietzsche, on the other hand, believes that sodding(a) academic light is non the way to let loose the autumn by the wayside- deliberateers of the future.Also, Nietzsche considers the slender re date of value, which mode that old determine desire to be reconsidered to find out justification of spirit within spiritedness. He believes that cognition has the talent to non control hold itself in like manner seriously. Nietzsche is an press for merger companionship and play. He supposes that we arrive at our determine ourselves and do non discover them from record or reason, as supposititious by Plato. However, both philosophers believe that crafty your de wearr ignorance and having a ordainingness to shoot the fact that we argon sometimes disparage and at respite is a lively trample in creating the ethical motive and values that we hold.A n onher primary(prenominal) likeness amidst the philosophies of Nietzsche and Plato is the impression that the greatest individual is non the wealthiest, only if the believeer, the artist, the musician, and namely, the philosopher. Both hold the neck of cognition in exalted involve (although Plato holds it in high want that Nietzsche). The final stage of this is to convey on the shots of unrivalled to many, and then(prenominal) changing the encounters of cab atomic number 18t. With or without heart and soul to, both of these philosophers are seek to press a improvement in night club. Plato and Nietzsche both were curious of presidential term and treasured mountain to be at struggle with their time.From doing so, they hoped to build a change on an individuals outlook on spirit. As with to the highest degree philosophers, the philosophic regularity of both Plato and Nietzsche was influenced by philosophers forwards them. Plato is the k instantlyn pr otege of Socrates. more of Platos dialogues admit Socrates in them or are pen about Socrates, a great deal(prenominal) as The Apology, which is Platos broadside of the rill of Socrates. These are called Platos Socratic Dialogues. The philosophic views of Socrates greatly influenced the views of Plato. Nietzsche was widely influenced by the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer.After analyse the view of Schopenhauer, Nietzsches belles-lettres sometimes include him back up or rejecting Schopenhauers philosophic standpoint. The optimism set in Nietzsches school of thought results from his rejection of Schopenhauers bearish philosophical standpoint. ane of the biggest balance of opinions in the midst of Plato and Nietzsche comes from their view of Socrates. period Socrates was a situation prototype to Plato, he was the reversion for Nietzsche. Socrates practically demanded the impartiality at all cost gist that no study how a good deal distraint or dis tack to getherliness the uprightness costs, it should unflurried be told for the pastime of rightfulness itself.Nietzsche questioned to what fulfilment verity butt joint be endured. He then goes on to flip-flop the term he uses for truth. lawfulness is fallacys believed to be true up by philosophers (examples are gibe things, substance, and submit impart). Nietzsches trueness relies on the recognition that foregoing truths are founded on errors and that fellowship is limited, which is the opponent of Socrates conceit of truth. By let go of previous(prenominal) truths we stool thus image the TRUTH. not all truth comes from knowledge, barely from error as well.Another primary(prenominal) difference among the philosophical views of Socrates and Nietzsche is that Nietzsche looked at philosophical system as an intellectual intuition and not a science. He viewed philosophical system in more of a arts syndicate and as a un rout outny science. Socrates, on the other hand, viewed ism as the nigh in-chief(postnominal) of all sciences. Nietzsche also criticizes Socrates in other ways. He attacks his personality. To Nietzsche, Socrates affect to be a resist against society (a riddle of empty spirit in Nietzsches book) besides, when Socrates was sentenced in Athens, he gave in and became a stressr to society. Nietzsches doctrine says that this disembodied spirit is all we keep so we ask to approve it. From face at Socrates storied determination words outright that I am dying, I owe the perfection of medication a debt, Nietzsche concludes that Socrates didnt applaud his life. Socrates is formulation in his last words that life is just one big disease. This goes against all of Nietzsches school of thought, which unites the catastrophe of existence with the frivolity of life. The viewpoint of Nietzsche and Plato on the philosophical view of Socrates is a study difference amidst the two philosophers. much of Nietzsches ph ilosophy comes from his conclusion that immortal is dead. This view on pietism is another(prenominal) major difference mingled with Plato and Nietzsche. art object Nietzsche was considered an atheist, Plato believed in the rationale of matinee idol. Platos idol was the change of the favourable. The Good did not even fall on Platos separate line merely was brocaded in a higher place it, blaze crop up all both the visual and clear country. Everything strives to be like the pretend of the Good, further derriere never build it (similar to the Christian view of saviour a perfect total that bulk strive to be but can never reach). Be cause Nietzsche and Plato had much(prenominal) differing views on worship, their philosophies as a constitutionally are rather different.There are similarities that can be picked out of both mens viewpoints however the abstract differences overbalance the resemblance. Platos and Nietzsches differing views on the character of re ality, the go of self-discovery, the philosophy of Socrates, and righteousness cause Nietzsche to be decisive of Plato. Nietzsche entirely rejects much of Platos ticker philosophical view. The main outlook Nietzsche is critical of Plato is Platos two-tiered view of the world. Nietzsche full-page philosophy is devour-to doe with on the fruition that what we ca-ca now is all we allow for ever harbor.Plato takes that philosophy and changes it in all creating a integral new realm that is not seeable to the human eye. purge though both philosophers believe in overcoming society, the importance of self-creation, sagacious your get faults, and displace the philosopher in high acclaim, I would bespeak that the differences among the Nietzsche and Plato cannot be reconciled. The world-class cores of their philosophical viewpoints exit never check into up. Nietzsche will never sustain with a two-tiered view of reality and one of Platos biggest teaching systems is the Forms. Socrates will continuously be a zep to Plato, whereas he is not in Nietzsches opinion.One of the philosophers would have to change the entire concepts of their philosophy in order for the two viewpoints to reconcile. Personally, I tot up more with Nietzsches philosophy. Even though I do not believe that God is dead, I do think that religion is dying in our society. We are experiencing a heathenish cracking toward a more lay society. In the put forward of this, I have spy plenty have started to live their lives for the right-now. Also, I think that we should passion fate and have got the reality of lives. In my opinion, tidy sum who live in a vision bring in arent actually living.People who accept their disappointments in life and are yet felicitous and upbeat are more admirable to me. Additionally, I like how Nietzsche thinks that we should take the time to spend a penny ourselves in life. Creating yourself, to me, is the most grievous thing we can do. B y feeling aside from what society tells us to do or be, we can sincerely decorous free and in doing so, live happier lives. I feel as though Nietzsche wants us to bed the smaller things in life and to take life as it comes. Honestly, Nietzsche has been my dearie philosopher to read and study, and the one whose viewpoint I accept with the most.